Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(8): 1391-1399, 2023 04 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2293570

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most studies of immunity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) measure antibody or cellular responses in blood; however, the virus infects mucosal surfaces in the nose and conjunctivae and infectious virus is rarely if ever present in the blood. METHODS: We used luciferase immunoprecipitation assays to measure SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in the plasma, nose, and saliva of infected persons and vaccine recipients. These assays measure antibody that can precipitate the SAR-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins. RESULTS: Levels of plasma anti-spike antibody declined less rapidly than levels of anti-nucleocapsid antibody in infected persons. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody levels in the nose declined more rapidly than antibody levels in the blood after vaccination of infected persons. Vaccination of previously infected persons boosted anti-spike antibody in plasma more than in the nose or saliva. Nasal and saliva anti-spike antibody levels were significantly correlated with plasma antibody in infected persons who had not been vaccinated and after vaccination of uninfected persons. CONCLUSIONS: Persistently elevated SARS-CoV-2 antibody in plasma may not indicate persistence of antibody at mucosal sites such as the nose. The strong correlation of SARS-CoV-2 antibody in the nose and saliva with that in the blood suggests that mucosal antibodies are derived primarily from transudation from the blood rather than local production. While SARS-CoV-2 vaccine given peripherally boosted mucosal immune responses in infected persons, the increase in antibody titers was higher in plasma than at mucosal sites. Taken together, these observations indicate the need for development of mucosal vaccines to induce potent immune responses at sites where SARS-CoV-2 infection occurs. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01306084.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Vaccination
2.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 13(2): 572-584, 2023 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2237217

ABSTRACT

Background: Accurate assessment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lung involvement through chest radiograph plays an important role in effective management of the infection. This study aims to develop a two-step feature merging method to integrate image features from deep learning and radiomics to differentiate COVID-19, non-COVID-19 pneumonia and normal chest radiographs (CXR). Methods: In this study, a deformable convolutional neural network (deformable CNN) was developed and used as a feature extractor to obtain 1,024-dimensional deep learning latent representation (DLR) features. Then 1,069-dimensional radiomics features were extracted from the region of interest (ROI) guided by deformable CNN's attention. The two feature sets were concatenated to generate a merged feature set for classification. For comparative experiments, the same process has been applied to the DLR-only feature set for verifying the effectiveness of feature concatenation. Results: Using the merged feature set resulted in an overall average accuracy of 91.0% for three-class classification, representing a statistically significant improvement of 0.6% compared to the DLR-only classification. The recall and precision of classification into the COVID-19 class were 0.926 and 0.976, respectively. The feature merging method was shown to significantly improve the classification performance as compared to using only deep learning features, regardless of choice of classifier (P value <0.0001). Three classes' F1-score were 0.892, 0.890, and 0.950 correspondingly (i.e., normal, non-COVID-19 pneumonia, COVID-19). Conclusions: A two-step COVID-19 classification framework integrating information from both DLR and radiomics features (guided by deep learning attention mechanism) has been developed. The proposed feature merging method has been shown to improve the performance of chest radiograph classification as compared to the case of using only deep learning features.

3.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 13(1): 394-416, 2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2124169

ABSTRACT

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) led to a dramatic increase in the number of cases of patients with pneumonia worldwide. In this study, we aimed to develop an AI-assisted multistrategy image enhancement technique for chest X-ray (CXR) images to improve the accuracy of COVID-19 classification. Methods: Our new classification strategy consisted of 3 parts. First, the improved U-Net model with a variational encoder segmented the lung region in the CXR images processed by histogram equalization. Second, the residual net (ResNet) model with multidilated-rate convolution layers was used to suppress the bone signals in the 217 lung-only CXR images. A total of 80% of the available data were allocated for training and validation. The other 20% of the remaining data were used for testing. The enhanced CXR images containing only soft tissue information were obtained. Third, the neural network model with a residual cascade was used for the super-resolution reconstruction of low-resolution bone-suppressed CXR images. The training and testing data consisted of 1,200 and 100 CXR images, respectively. To evaluate the new strategy, improved visual geometry group (VGG)-16 and ResNet-18 models were used for the COVID-19 classification task of 2,767 CXR images. The accuracy of the multistrategy enhanced CXR images was verified through comparative experiments with various enhancement images. In terms of quantitative verification, 8-fold cross-validation was performed on the bone suppression model. In terms of evaluating the COVID-19 classification, the CXR images obtained by the improved method were used to train 2 classification models. Results: Compared with other methods, the CXR images obtained based on the proposed model had better performance in the metrics of peak signal-to-noise ratio and root mean square error. The super-resolution CXR images of bone suppression obtained based on the neural network model were also anatomically close to the real CXR images. Compared with the initial CXR images, the classification accuracy rates of the internal and external testing data on the VGG-16 model increased by 5.09% and 12.81%, respectively, while the values increased by 3.51% and 18.20%, respectively, for the ResNet-18 model. The numerical results were better than those of the single-enhancement, double-enhancement, and no-enhancement CXR images. Conclusions: The multistrategy enhanced CXR images can help to classify COVID-19 more accurately than the other existing methods.

4.
Brief Bioinform ; 23(6)2022 Nov 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2037395

ABSTRACT

A transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) is a collection of transcription regulators with their associated downstream genes, which is highly condition-specific. Understanding how cell states can be programmed through small molecules/drugs or conditions by modulating the whole gene expression system granted us the potential to amend abnormal cells and cure diseases. Condition Orientated Regulatory Networks (CORN, https://qinlab.sysu.edu.cn/home) is a library of condition (small molecule/drug treatments and gene knockdowns)-based transcriptional regulatory sub-networks (TRSNs) that come with an online TRSN matching tool. It allows users to browse condition-associated TRSNs or match those TRSNs by inputting transcriptomic changes of interest. CORN utilizes transcriptomic changes data after specific conditional treatment in cells, and in vivo transcription factor (TF) binding data in cells, by combining TF binding information and calculations of significant expression alterations of TFs and genes after the conditional treatments, TRNs under the effect of different conditions were constructed. In short, CORN associated 1805 different types of specific conditions (small molecule/drug treatments and gene knockdowns) to 9553 TRSNs in 25 human cell lines, involving 204TFs. By linking and curating specific conditions to responsive TRNs, the scientific community can now perceive how TRNs are altered and controlled by conditions alone in an organized manner for the first time. This study demonstrated with examples that CORN can aid the understanding of molecular pathology, pharmacology and drug repositioning, and screened drugs with high potential for cancer and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatments.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gene Regulatory Networks , Humans , COVID-19/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcriptome
5.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 12(7): 3917-3931, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1884868

ABSTRACT

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic disease. Fast and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 from chest radiography may enable more efficient allocation of scarce medical resources and hence improved patient outcomes. Deep learning classification of chest radiographs may be a plausible step towards this. We hypothesize that bone suppression of chest radiographs may improve the performance of deep learning classification of COVID-19 phenomena in chest radiographs. Methods: Two bone suppression methods (Gusarev et al. and Rajaraman et al.) were implemented. The Gusarev and Rajaraman methods were trained on 217 pairs of normal and bone-suppressed chest radiographs from the X-ray Bone Shadow Suppression dataset (https://www.kaggle.com/hmchuong/xray-bone-shadow-supression). Two classifier methods with different network architectures were implemented. Binary classifier models were trained on the public RICORD-1c and RSNA Pneumonia Challenge datasets. An external test dataset was created retrospectively from a set of 320 COVID-19 positive patients from Queen Elizabeth Hospital (Hong Kong, China) and a set of 518 non-COVID-19 patients from Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital (Hong Kong, China), and used to evaluate the effect of bone suppression on classifier performance. Classification performance, quantified by sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), for non-suppressed radiographs was compared to that for bone suppressed radiographs. Some of the pre-trained models used in this study are published at (https://github.com/danielnflam). Results: Bone suppression of external test data was found to significantly (P<0.05) improve AUC for one classifier architecture [from 0.698 (non-suppressed) to 0.732 (Rajaraman-suppressed)]. For the other classifier architecture, suppression did not significantly (P>0.05) improve or worsen classifier performance. Conclusions: Rajaraman suppression significantly improved classification performance in one classification architecture, and did not significantly worsen classifier performance in the other classifier architecture. This research could be extended to explore the impact of bone suppression on classification of different lung pathologies, and the effect of other image enhancement techniques on classifier performance.

6.
Stat Med ; 40(19): 4252-4268, 2021 08 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1222698

ABSTRACT

Since the outbreak of the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19), a large number of scientific studies and data analysis reports have been published in the International Journal of Medicine and Statistics. Taking the estimation of the incubation period as an example, we propose a low-cost method to integrate external research results and available internal data together. By using empirical likelihood method, we can effectively incorporate summarized information even if it may be derived from a misspecified model. Taking the possible uncertainty in summarized information into account, we augment a logarithm of the normal density in the log empirical likelihood. We show that the augmented log-empirical likelihood can produce enhanced estimates for the underlying parameters compared with the method without utilizing auxiliary information. Moreover, the Wilks' theorem is proved to be true. We illustrate our methodology by analyzing a COVID-19 incubation period data set retrieved from Zhejiang Province and summarized information from a similar study in Shenzhen, China.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Infectious Disease Incubation Period , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Research Design , SARS-CoV-2 , Uncertainty
7.
Diabetes ; 70(5): 1061-1069, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1088886

ABSTRACT

Obesity has caused wide concerns due to its high prevalence in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Coexistence of diabetes and obesity could cause an even higher risk of severe outcomes due to immunity dysfunction. We conducted a retrospective study in 1,637 adult patients who were admitted into an acute hospital in Wuhan, China. Propensity score-matched logistic regression was used to estimate the risks of severe pneumonia and requiring in-hospital oxygen therapy associated with obesity. After adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities, obesity was significantly associated with higher odds of severe pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] 1.47 [95% CI 1.15-1.88]; P = 0.002) and oxygen therapy (OR 1.40 [95% CI 1.10-1.79]; P = 0.007). Higher ORs of severe pneumonia due to obesity were observed in men, older adults, and those with diabetes. Among patients with diabetes, overweight increased the odds of requiring in-hospital oxygen therapy by 0.68 times (P = 0.014) and obesity increased the odds by 1.06 times (P = 0.028). A linear dose-response curve between BMI and severe outcomes was observed in all patients, whereas a U-shaped curve was observed in those with diabetes. Our findings provide important evidence to support obesity as an independent risk factor for severe outcomes of COVID-19 infection in the early phase of the ongoing pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Body Mass Index , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19/therapy , China/epidemiology , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Overweight/epidemiology , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors
8.
Health Inf Sci Syst ; 8(1): 28, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-805373

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is continuing its spread across the world, claiming more than 160,000 lives and sickening more than 2,400,000 people as of April 21, 2020. Early research has reported a basic reproduction number (R0) between 2.2 to 3.6, implying that the majority of the population is at risk of infection if no intervention measures were undertaken. The true size of the COVID-19 epidemic remains unknown, as a significant proportion of infected individuals only exhibit mild symptoms or are even asymptomatic. A timely assessment of the evolving epidemic size is crucial for resource allocation and triage decisions. In this article, we modify the back-calculation algorithm to obtain a lower bound estimate of the number of COVID-19 infected persons in China in and outside the Hubei province. We estimate the infection density among infected and show that the drastic control measures enforced throughout China following the lockdown of Wuhan City effectively slowed down the spread of the disease in two weeks. We also investigate the COVID-19 epidemic size in South Korea and find a similar effect of its "test, trace, isolate, and treat" strategy. Our findings are expected to provide guidelines and enlightenment for surveillance and control activities of COVID-19 in other countries around the world.

9.
BMJ Open ; 10(7):e035308-e035308, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-662382

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for multistate transitions across different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus under primary care. SETTING: We retrieved the anonymised electronic health records of a population-based retrospective cohort in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 26 197 patients were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The new-onset, progression and regression of CKD were defined by the transitions of four stages that were classified by combining glomerular filtration rate and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. We applied a multiscale multistate Poisson regression model to estimate the rates of the stage transitions by integrating the baseline demographic characteristics, routine laboratory test results and clinical data from electronic health records. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up time of 1.8 years, there were 2632 patients newly diagnosed with CKD, 1746 progressed to the next stage and 1971 regressed into an earlier stage. The models achieved the best performance in predicting the new-onset and progression with the predictors of sex, age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, haemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides and drug prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that individual risks of new-onset and progression of CKD can be predicted from the routine physical and laboratory test results. The individualised prediction curves developed from this study could potentially be applied to routine clinical practices, to facilitate clinical decision making, risk communications with patients and early interventions.

10.
Hypertens Res ; 43(11): 1267-1276, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-733529

ABSTRACT

Hypertension is a common comorbidity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection. This study aimed to estimate the risks of adverse events associated with in-hospital blood pressure (BP) control and the effects of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) prescription in COVID-19 patients with concomitant hypertension. In this retrospective cohort study, the anonymized medical records of COVID-19 patients were retrieved from an acute field hospital in Wuhan, China. Clinical data, drug prescriptions, and laboratory investigations were collected for individual patients with diagnosed hypertension on admission. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risks of adverse outcomes associated with BP control during the hospital stay. Of 803 hypertensive patients, 67 (8.3%) were admitted to the ICU, 30 (3.7%) had respiratory failure, 26 (3.2%) had heart failure, and 35 (4.8%) died. After adjustment for confounders, the significant predictors of heart failure were average systolic blood pressure (SBP) (hazard ratio (HR) per 10 mmHg 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15, 3.13) and pulse pressure (HR per 10 mmHg 2.71, 95% CI: 1.39, 5.29). The standard deviations of SBP and diastolic BP were independently associated with mortality and ICU admission. The risk estimates of poor BP control were comparable between patients receiving ARBs and those not receiving ARBs, with the only exception of a high risk of heart failure in the non-ARB group. Poor BP control was independently associated with higher risks of adverse outcomes of COVID-19. ARB drugs did not increase the risks of adverse events in hypertensive patients.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Hypertension/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Aged , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Female , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Sci Adv ; 6(33): eabc1202, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-733187

ABSTRACT

We have proposed a novel, accurate low-cost method to estimate the incubation-period distribution of COVID-19 by conducting a cross-sectional and forward follow-up study. We identified those presymptomatic individuals at their time of departure from Wuhan and followed them until the development of symptoms. The renewal process was adopted by considering the incubation period as a renewal and the duration between departure and symptoms onset as a forward time. Such a method enhances the accuracy of estimation by reducing recall bias and using the readily available data. The estimated median incubation period was 7.76 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.02 to 8.53], and the 90th percentile was 14.28 days (95% CI: 13.64 to 14.90). By including the possibility that a small portion of patients may contract the disease on their way out of Wuhan, the estimated probability that the incubation period is longer than 14 days was between 5 and 10%.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Infectious Disease Incubation Period , Models, Statistical , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
12.
Biometrics ; 77(3): 929-941, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-634693

ABSTRACT

The incubation period and generation time are key characteristics in the analysis of infectious diseases. The commonly used contact-tracing-based estimation of incubation distribution is highly influenced by the individuals' judgment on the possible date of exposure, and might lead to significant errors. On the other hand, interval censoring-based methods are able to utilize a much larger set of traveling data but may encounter biased sampling problems. The distribution of generation time is usually approximated by observed serial intervals. However, it may result in a biased estimation of generation time, especially when the disease is infectious during incubation. In this paper, the theory from renewal process is partially adopted by considering the incubation period as the interarrival time, and the duration between departure from Wuhan and onset of symptoms as the mixture of forward time and interarrival time with censored intervals. In addition, a consistent estimator for the distribution of generation time based on incubation period and serial interval is proposed for incubation-infectious diseases. A real case application to the current outbreak of COVID-19 is implemented. We find that the incubation period has a median of 8.50 days (95% confidence interval [CI] [7.22; 9.15]). The basic reproduction number in the early phase of COVID-19 outbreak based on the proposed generation time estimation is estimated to be 2.96 (95% CI [2.15; 3.86]).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epidemics , Infectious Disease Incubation Period , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Infect Dis Poverty ; 9(1): 78, 2020 Jun 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-617375

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is now a global public threat. Given the pandemic of COVID-19, the economic impact of COVID-19 is essential to add value to the policy-making process. We retrospectively conducted a cost and affordability analysis to determine the medical costs of COVID-19 patients in China, and also assess the factors affecting their costs. METHODS: This analysis was retrospectively conducted in Shandong Provincial Chest Hospital between 24 January and 16 March 2020. The total direct medical expenditures were analyzed by cost factors. We also assessed affordability by comparing the simulated out-of-pocket expenditure of COVID-19 cases relative to the per capita disposable income. Differences between groups were tested by student t test and Mann-Whitney test when appropriate. A multiple logistic regression model was built to determine the risk factors associated with high cost. RESULTS: A total of 70 COVID-19 patients were included in the analysis. The overall mean cost was USD 6827 per treated episode. The highest mean cost was observed in drug acquisition, accounting for 45.1% of the overall cost. Total mean cost was significantly higher in patients with pre-existing diseases compared to those without pre-existing diseases. Pre-existing diseases and the advanced disease severity were strongly associated with higher cost. Around USD 0.49 billion were expected for clinical manage of COVID-19 in China. Among rural households, the proportions of health insurance coverage should be increased to 70% for severe cases, and 80% for critically ill cases to avoid catastrophic health expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that clinical management of COVID-19 patients incurs a great financial burden to national health insurance. The cost for drug acquisition is the major contributor to the medical cost, whereas the risk factors for higher cost are pre-existing diseases and severity of COVID-19. Improvement of insurance coverage will need to address the barriers of rural patients to avoid the occurrence of catastrophic health expenditure.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19 , Child , Child, Preschool , China , Coronavirus Infections/economics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , National Health Programs/economics , Pandemics/economics , Pneumonia, Viral/economics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Rural Population , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
14.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.03.06.20032417

ABSTRACT

Background: The current outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has quickly spread across countries and become a global crisis. However, one of the most important clinical characteristics in epidemiology, the distribution of the incubation period, remains unclear. Different estimates of the incubation period of COVID-19 were reported in recent published studies, but all have their own limitations. In this study, we propose a novel low-cost and accurate method to estimate the incubation distribution. Methods: We have conducted a cross-sectional and forward follow-up study by identifying those asymptomatic individuals at their time of departure from Wuhan and then following them until their symptoms developed. The renewal process is hence adopted by considering the incubation period as a renewal and the duration between departure and symptom onset as a forward recurrence time. Under mild assumptions, the observations of selected forward times can be used to consistently estimate the parameters in the distribution of the incubation period. Such a method enhances the accuracy of estimation by reducing recall bias and utilizing the abundant and readily available forward time data. Findings: The estimated distribution of forward time fits the observations in the collected data well. The estimated median of incubation period is 8.13 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.37-8.91), the mean is 8.62 days (95% CI: 8.02-9.28), the 90th percentile is 14.65 days (95% CI: 14.00-15.26), and the 99th percentile is 20.59 days (95% CI: 19.47, 21.62). Compared with results in other studies, the incubation period estimated in this study is longer. Interpretation: Based on the estimated incubation distribution in this study, about 10% of patients with COVID-19 would not develop symptoms until 14 days after infection. Further study of the incubation distribution is warranted to directly estimate the proportion with long incubation periods.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Memory Disorders
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL